Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« Supreme Court Tipping Their Hand: Congressional intent to transfer jurisdiction from constitutional to legislative courts, to emasculate the former | Main | Sui Juris Court Angels Peoples Court of the Land Jurisdiction | Public Order »

Consider the ICCPR and our MOTION FOR 10 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENTS

I'd like to see more Americans pick up where we left off
with this challenge to the Senate's ratification of the ICCPR:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/civil/iccpr/


I really do think America is WAY OVERDUE for one or more
State Courts to tackle this "not self-executing" ruse and
declare it UNconstitutional, as we requested above.

Judge Harpool got cold feet:  there was no excuse
for ignoring a perfectly good MOTION FOR
INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENTS.

 
See the sections which discuss "state and local governments" here:

http://supremelaw.org/ref/treaty/
http://supremelaw.org/ref/treaty/reservations.htm

Understanding (5):

"(5) That the United States understands that this Covenant shall be implemented by the Federal Government to the extent that it exercises legislative and judicial jurisdiction over the matters covered therein, and otherwise by the state and local governments; to the extent that state and local governments exercise jurisdiction over such matters, the Federal Government shall take measures appropriate to the Federal system to the end that the competent authorities of the state or local governments may take appropriate measures for the fulfillment of the Covenant."


Now read this Executive Order on "Federalism":

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/civil/iccpr/Executive.Order.13132.pdf


and this Executive Order on implementing Human Rights Treaties,

which expressly mentions the ICCPR:


http://supremelaw.org/cc/hill/civil/iccpr/Executive.Order.13107.pdf



Does the latter E.O. address whether or not
the ICCPR is "not self-executing"?

http://supremelaw.org/authors/carter/
http://supremelaw.org/authors/seibert-fohr/
http://supremelaw.org/authors/buergenthal/


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964

http://supremelaw.org/crowd.funding.option.htm  (Join Us!)
http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. <supremelawfirm@gmail.com> wrote:

April 24, 2015 in Current Affairs | Permalink