Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« Former White House Secret Service agent John Carmen tells about how he was shown the Zapruder film when he was in Secret Service Training in 1974 | Main | KGB Col. Oleg Nechiporenko, stationed in Mexico City: many in the Mexican intelligence service DFS suspected Lyndon Johnson in the wake of the JFK assassination. The CIA helped to create and run the DFS. »

Please forward to Lyndon McLellan, L & M Conv. Mart, Fairmont, North Carolina 28340

I am writing to offer some resources to you, and to the Institute for Justice,
in the matter described above.

Since at least 2001, my office has been involved professionally
in an investigation of missing and defective credentials that are
required of Federal officers by Acts of Congress and by the
Oath of Office Clause in the U.S. Constitution:

http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/laws.and.regs.htm


One of the major findings of our investigation is that U.S. Attorneys
and Assistant U.S. Attorneys have consistently failed to execute
the second OATH required by 28 U.S.C. 544.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/544


Also, the U.S. OPM Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS
published at OPM's Internet website is a proven COUNTERFEIT:

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/opm/USMS.Meeting.No.4.htm

http://supremelaw.org/cc/hedges/United.States.Notice.htm


The statute at 5 U.S.C. 5507 is very clear for prohibiting
Federal "officers" from being paid any salaries, if they
have failed to execute valid APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/5507

 
The decision in U.S. v. Pignatiello by a Federal District Judge
in Colorado is very relevant, and applicable, whenever Oaths of Office
are missing and/or defective:

https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-pignatiello-2

There is sound policy support for requiring the oath of office. It solemnizes the appointment and sensitizes the appointed person to the obligations and limitations of the office. Additionally, it formalizes the appointment and works an official notification that the appointed person represents the government of the United States in its prosecuting authority and binds that branch of government to the acts of the appointed individual. In terms familiar to the law of agency, the oath is evidence of actual authority of the attorney as agent and thereby avoids disputes which could be generated by reliance upon some apparent authority.


If your lawyers do not wish to pursue this line of discovery,
my office can help you do so.


Good luck and God bless you always and every way.



Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964

http://supremelaw.org/crowd.funding.option.htm  (Join Us!)
http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)

May 3, 2015 in Current Affairs | Permalink