Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0
HEIGHT=

Youngevity BTT 2.0 + Healthy Start Paks 2.0

Coffees from Youngevity
HEIGHT=

Coffees from Youngevity

Youngevity Be The Change

Youngevity Healthy Chocolate

GOFoods Youngevity

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.
HEIGHT=

Join or Create a Ron Paul Meetup,.

Ron Paul Forums
HEIGHT=

Ron Paul Forums

APFN Message Board
HEIGHT=

APFN Message Board

Leo Emil Wanta / Wantagate Links

++++++++++++++++++ EBAY ITEMS 4 SALE ++++++++++++++++++

« UGP sticker from back in the day | Main | Freedom Watch »

Re: Invoices

correction:  False Claims Act is here:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/3729​  et seq.
​(fixed below)​

 



>  the question is, how exactly was the liability created and perfected? 

See 5 U.S.C. 5507, in particular:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/5507

We just assembled this comprehensive list of findings and conclusions:
http://supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/credential.investigation.facts.and.laws.htm

Also the False Claims Act at 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.:


 
And, of course, Civil RICO at 18 U.S.C. 1964:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1964

http://supremelaw.org/decs/agency/civil.rico.htm

http://supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm

The object of civil RICO is thus not merely to compensate victims but to turn them into prosecutors, "private attorneys general," dedicated to eliminating racketeering activity.  Id., at 187 (citing Malley-Duff483 U.S., at 151 ) (civil RICO specifically has a "further purpose [of] encouraging potential private plaintiffs diligently to investigate").  The provision for treble damages is accordingly justified by the expected benefit of suppressing racketeering activity, an object pursued the sooner the better.
 
/s/ Paul


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;
Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),
Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.
http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)



On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 9:04 AM, <admin@lighthouseliberty.club> wrote:
 
Hello Paul, 
 
You were briefly a member of the law club and Tam Worth, a close associate, has shared with me some communications you've had with him.  
 
I've seen some of the invoices you've issued to the black robes and I'm interested in helping any way I can.  I am quite familiar with commercial processes and, while I'm certainly no expert on the matter, nor am I a trained attorney, I do have some experience and have studied the issue closely over the years. 
 
I'd be interested to know more about the basis for the invoices and what has been done to perfect the obligation in commercial terms.  As you know, an invoice is a reflection of, or a demand upon a pre-existing obligation.  So in other words, the question is, how exactly was the liability created and perfected? 
 
it is possible to securitize those obligations.  In fact there are a couple chapters in my book dealing with some folks who learned exactly how to do that in a way which the banks and the U.S. Treasury accepted and monetized. 
 
of course you know you're playing with fire, but fire can be a great tool when controlled properly! 
 
I hope to hear from you. 
 
Mark 
 
Where empowerment begins... Tyranny ends! 
 

August 16, 2015 in Current Affairs | Permalink